{"id":207,"date":"2016-08-29T07:27:05","date_gmt":"2016-08-29T07:27:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/?page_id=207"},"modified":"2021-07-29T08:14:15","modified_gmt":"2021-07-29T08:14:15","slug":"test-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/test-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Unknown Mixture"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To test the reliability of our software SmartDalton, we compare the results obtained using SmartDalton and 2 other softwares, 1) the widely used Automated Mass spectral Deconvolution and Identification System (AMDIS) and 2) an open source software. Firstly, we uploaded the same GC-MS data to\u00a0all 3 software. Analyzing the TIC time range of 16.806min to 16.966min, we obtained the results from all the softwares\u00a0and made a comparison in the table below. The results clearly show that SmartDalton provides the user with accurate and precise\u00a0information of the deconvoluted\u00a0peaks. Furthermore,\u00a0SmartDalton is the only software which is able to provide an estimation of the\u00a0concentration profile of the deconvoluted peaks.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-59 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Comparision-1.png\" alt=\"Comparision\" width=\"2404\" height=\"1469\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Comparision-1.png 2404w, https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Comparision-1-300x183.png 300w, https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Comparision-1-768x469.png 768w, https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Comparision-1-1024x626.png 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2404px) 100vw, 2404px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*Results do not match well with NIST library.<\/span>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To test the reliability of our software SmartDalton, we compare the results obtained using SmartDalton and 2 other softwares, 1) the widely used Automated Mass spectral Deconvolution and Identification System (AMDIS) and 2) an open source software. Firstly, we uploaded the same GC-MS data to\u00a0all 3 software. Analyzing the TIC time range of 16.806min to<a href=\"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/test-2\/\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/207"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":639,"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/207\/revisions\/639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chemopower.com\/OCAS\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}